Wednesday, 9 April 2008

NYT News Alerts and Integration

I had signed up to the NYT news alerts.

Here's how they describe their breaking news alert, which is the one I picked:

NYTimes.com editors will send you Breaking News Alerts when, in their judgment, significant and important news breaks anywhere around the globe.

Here is a recent example cluttering my inbox of a "significant and important news break from anywhere around the globe" that NYTimes.com editors judged significant.

Breaking News Alert
The New York Times
Tuesday, April 8, 2008 -- 10:49 PM ET-----
Tennessee Defeats Stanford, 64-48, in the N.C.A.A. Women's Championship Tennessee dominated Stanford, giving its coach, Pat Summitt,her eighth national championship.

I'm pretty up to speed on global news but I don't know who Pat Summitt is, couldn't tell you what NCAA stands for without guessing, and couldn't care less. Who would, except Americans and perhaps international alumni of American colleges?

The day before? News that the congestion charging south of 60th street in Manhattan had been voted down. Now if that isn't the perfect metaphor for NYT Manhattan centric-ism then I don't know what is.

That is just plain parochial.

Not an uninteresting story, but a breaking news alert of significant importance from anywhere round the world? Get real.

It's worth remembering that it is NYT editors who are shaping the future and editorial content of the IHT.

Two names to watch: Marty Gottlieb and Tom Redburn.

The buzz word in Paris right now: INTEGRATION.

Sounds ominous doesn't it? If that means intergrating the NYT's view of the world into the IHT's then what we will get is the NYT's which, as illustrated by the above, isn't quite the same.

Already seeing much more US content after an intelligent pullback over recent years, and I'm not just refering to the primary coverage (which I happen to think the IHT editors have got way out of whack in terms of column inches devoted thereto. Yesterday's paper, I think it was, was particularly US-centric.)

Watch this space for some analysis about what that word INTEGRATION MEANS when deployed by NYT editors in Paris.

Friday, 28 March 2008

Newsweek helps out New York Times Travel Section.

Whoops.

Not sure we'll be reading about B.A, Argentina in the International Herald Tribune anytime soon.

According to an Argentinian blogger, 'in an apparently well-researched article', a NYT travel editor riffed off (oris it ripped off?) another media as Mike Oreskes would say. Similarities between a piece about Buenos Aires in Newsweek and the NYT are startling.

Look, I do it all the time, so I appreciate the problem of just nicking people's material and using it but I am, I hope, up front about it.

To avoid doing it, I wont cut and paste and instead direct you to check out the link below which has riffed off the blogger.


http://www.mediabistro.com/fishbowlny/newspapers/did_the_new_york_times_travel_editor_steal_a_story_from_newsweek_80946.asp

Wednesday, 26 March 2008

Abraham H. Foxman

Abraham H. Foxman is back in the letters pages of the International Herald Tribune today.

Mr. Foxman is the New York U.S. national director of the Anti-Defamation League.

A quick search on www.iht.com shows he has about 3 letters published a year.

One observation, one question:

a) Observation: Like most of the letter writers to the IHT, he is not a one-off contributor. Most IHT letter writers have appeared before, so in this respect, there is nothing unusual about his regular appearances.

b) Question: is there a pro-Palestinian organisation, or even a Palestinian letter writer, who has about 3 letters a year published in the IHT?

I don't know the answer to my question but I think the IHT should check that if there is, they get the same exposure as Mr. Foxman.

If there isn't such an organised Palestinian voice, I would say it reflects badly on the public relations infrastructure of the Palestinian people, and perhaps they need some help.

Tuesday, 25 March 2008

Looney Tunes at www.iht.com

Has anyone had a careful read of who and what is being posted on the "B.Hussein Obama, he's a pinko, Commie, American-hating, sodomite loving, racist, grandmother-throwing-under-bus SOCIALST LIBERAL!" discussion group at www.iht.com?

http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/03/23/america/liberal.php?d=1#comment?d=1&m=1

Has any iht.com discussion board attracted more comments (soon approaching 600) with so few from IHT readers outside the USA?

It's a Hannity Fox-fest.

Bring it down man. It's just too weird.

And who's moderating this stuff? If you wouldn't publish it as a letter in the IHT why let some of this stuff get posted?

I'm not talking about free speech, I'm talking about quality of debate.

Sunday, 16 March 2008

Fake memoirs and duping the NYT

As the biggest discussion group on the IHT is the latest fake memoir, check out NYT reader's editor trying to explain it all away.

Basically it boils down this: we assumed the publisher checked.

C'mon!

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/16/opinion/16pubed.html

Friday, 14 March 2008

Another observation on IHT discussion groups

I've spent half an hour or so looking at the discussion groups on http://www.iht.com/ and what they can tell us about the IHT's readership, at least online.

What also stands out, beyond the tech issue, is that if the IHT want to get triple digit contributions, the topic has to be American.

Indeed, the topics currently online as of today that have more than 100 contributions are all topics coming out of the USA.

  1. Share your thoughts on Eliot Spitzer and his political future. (111 comments)
  2. Democrats are battling over how to hold do-over primaries in Florida and Michigan. Being debated are what kind of contests to hold, when to hold them, how to allocate the delegates and, critically, who picks up the tab in each state. Share your thoughts. (192 comments)
  3. Another author has been found to have fabricated their memoirs. Share your thoughts on their motivations. (260 comments)
  4. Share your predictions for the Democratic race in Texas and Ohio. (101 comments)
None of the other 26 discussion groups currently up at time of writing hit triple digits.

Now, I haven't had time to de-duplicate contributors, but with such low numbers in terms of participation, lower even when de-duplicated, I would say http://www.iht.com/ has a problem connecting with its audience, or its core audience is very small, or they're just too damned important to write posts and send in letters (most letter writers are regulars rather than one offs by the way, something easily seen if you search for their names on http://www.iht.com/)

I think better discussion topics would be a good start, because, to be frank, some are extremely dull. Timely does not make for interesting. Some examples:

  1. Do you think the fact that the Democratic race is still going on will help or hurt John McCain? (7 comments)
  2. Do you think the U.S. Air Force made the right choice in giving the contract to EADS? (31 comments)
  3. Despite a slowdown in growth, interest in the use of search engines as marketing tools is unabated. Are you likely to click on a paid link before looking for an unpaid one? (1 comment)
  4. Toshiba, champion of the HD DVD standard, has lost the battle to Sony and its Blu-ray format as the successor to DVD. Now that one standard has prevailed, do you plan to trade in your DVDs for Blu-Ray discs? (3 comments)
  5. In an age when many define themselves by what they will and won't eat, dietary differences can strain a romance. What role does food play in your relationship? (17 comments)

My rule of thumb would be this: what are IHT readers in Europe and Asia and the Americas and indeed elsewhere talking about at dinner or around the water cooler? My guess is none of the above.

Who is deciding what discussions to post and how much of a sensibility do they have for the IHT reader?

IHT readers interest in technology

Just an observation, but has anyone noticed how few comments are posted on the International Herald Tribune's discussion boards on all matters tech, as compared with other discussion groups.

What does this tell us?

My guess is that given the subject matter (e.g social networking) the IHT's readers are just too old to care. Or that techies prefer to post on dedicated techie sites.

Here are some examples of what I am talking about:
  1. Do you think the removal of restrictions on electronic equipment sales is a sign of more change to come in Cuba? (1 comment)
  2. Mobile war over social networking (says there are 3 comments but the link doesn't work)
  3. How should bloggers deal with anonymous posts that amount to personal attacks? (3 comments)
  4. Despite a slowdown in growth, interest in the use of search engines as marketing tools is unabated. Are you likely to click on a paid link before looking for an unpaid one? (1 comment)
  5. A german court ruled that surveillance of personal computers would be allowed only for exceptional cases. Should the authorities be allowed to use virus-like software to spy on suspects' computers? (5 comments)
  6. Toshiba, champion of the HD DVD standard, has lost the battle to Sony and its Blu-ray format as the successor to DVD. Now that one standard has prevailed, do you plan to trade in your DVDs for Blu-Ray discs? (3 comments)Toshiba, champion of the HD DVD standard, has lost the battle to Sony and its Blu-ray format as the successor to DVD. Now that one standard has prevailed, do you plan to trade in your DVDs for Blu-Ray discs? (3 comments)

In fact, of the 30 discussion topics put out there by www.iht.com the technology ones account for all but one of the 7 lowest response topics.

Any thoughts as to why this is; any thoughts as to why the techies at www.iht.com won't get the hint that whether we are going to trade in our DVDs for Blu-Ray discs hardly makes gripping discussion?