Showing posts with label Internet competition. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Internet competition. Show all posts

Thursday, 16 October 2008

Could Recession Help Big Media? (Forbes)






Online Publishers



Could Recession Help Big Media?


James Erik Abels, 10.15.08, 7:45 PM ET


Today's ugly media truth: Online advertising rates are falling. "Pricing has definitely trended downward this year," says PubMatic President Rajeev Goel.
His firm, which lets publishers automatically search mulitple ad networks to find the one that will earn the most money, has been tracking online display ad rates since the fourth quarter of last year. In a report issued on Wednesday, Goel says these rates dropped 21% in the third quarter of this year to $0.27 per thousand impressions from $0.34 per thousand impressions in the second quarter. The information is culled from some 180 online ad networks, including seven of comScore's top 10 largest ones.
Numbers like these chill media honchos from coast to coast. At a Media and Money Conference in New York on Tuesday, a whole panel of executives discussed the issue. Martha Stewart Omnimedia co-CEO Wenda Harris Millard said she's worried, noting that advertisers are holding out until the last second to buy ads.
But so far it's hard to say how a recession will impact digital media. On one hand, the rate of online display ad spending has been slowing down. Though it reached $11.5 billion in the first half of this year, reports the Internet Advertising Bureau, the 15.2% growth rate that got the industry there was a lot slower than the rate seen in the first half of 2007, which was 27%.
On the other hand, the slowing market may actually help, boosting traditional media's control over the digital media ecosystem by giving it an opportunity to buy smaller upstarts or watch them get crushed. Think about it this way: The digital businesses that may be hit hardest by a downturn aren't really media businesses at all. Instead, outfits like Facebook, Meebo, and Twitter provide fun tools and communications technologies for people who, when aggregated in one spot, may be worth a lot of ad dollars--if they can actually grab them.
That's going to get tougher. Chrysler said Wednesday that it is starting to withhold ad dollars from "experimental" ad campaigns for things like virtual worlds or social networking applications. That hurts Facebook but maybe not traditional publishers like Hearst. It's also bad news for ad networks and helps to explain their plunging rates.
Here's why. Advertisers have a pretty good idea on their own of who is paying attention to certain types of editorial content--and they bet its quality level improves the value of their ad. In the media universe, it's called "sold against" and it's nothing new. But online advertising networks, which place ads via technology, have devalued the notion in recent years by making ad serving a commodity business that benefits nonmedia sites as much as it does media ones. Some see the value of "sold against" gaining more ground online in a nervous time when fewer dollars are available.
Brian Fitzgerald, president of Gorilla Nation Media, an ad rep firm that exclusively sells display ads for publishers and others, such as Marvel, says his rates aren't slipping yet. And though he admits it's still early to know how the markets will ultimately affect them, "We're actually seeing revenues growing, CPMs are constant," he says.
Constant--and a whole lot higher than $0.27 per thousand views.











READ AN ALTERNATIVE IHT DAILY NARRATIVE AT
A PLACE IN THE AUVERGNE

International Herald Tribune
IHT
New York Times
NYT

Vacation /Business Trip Furnished Apartment in Paris


Wednesday, 15 October 2008

FT Group reports 11% revenue rise (Guardian)




FT Group reports 11% revenue rise
Oliver Luft
guardian.co.uk,
Wednesday October 15 2008 10.06 BST
larger smaller
Article history
Financial Times publisher FT Group enjoyed an 11% year-on-year rise in total revenues for the first nine months of 2008, bucking the downward trend in recent newspaper sector financial results.
FT Group saw advertising revenue rising 1% over the same period, parent company
Pearson reported today in a trading update.
The increase in circulation and advertising revenues was matched by an increase in interactive data revenue, which rose 8% over the same period in 2007, gaining from continued growth of new businesses, the trading update stated.
This group-wide increase included a revenue rise of 14% at FT Publishing, which houses the FT and the company's specialist trade titles, with Pearson saying it expected this part of the business to increase profits this year.
"The Financial Times and Mergermarket are continuing to increase their content revenues and build their audiences through the volatility in global financial markets," the company said.
"Mergermarket is achieving good sales growth and strong renewal rates. Operating profits continue to show good growth, as expected, and for the full year we expect FT Publishing to increase profits even if there is no growth in advertising revenues."
Overall in the first nine months of 2008 Pearson also saw revenue increase, up 8% year on year, with operating profit up 11%.
The company stated it continued to perform well despite the economic crisis, that trading was in line with expectations, and that earnings for the full year would be towards the top end of market estimates if the US dollar continued to strengthen against the pound.
Pearson reported strong growth in its education divisions, with overall revenue in this area up 10%.
These positive figures saw Pearson shares rise this morning, increasing 3.4% on last night's close to 578.50p at around 9.30am, amid another sharp general decline in the FTSE 100 in London in early trading.
"Pearson's strong performance continues. We're naturally cautious about the global economic conditions, but we have good trading momentum, innovative products, resilient businesses and a strong balance sheet," said the Pearson Group chief executive, Marjorie Scardino.
"With those advantages, we believe we are in good shape to prosper and strengthen our company, even through these turbulent times."
· To contact the MediaGuardian news desk email
editor@mediaguardian.co.uk or phone 020 7239 9857. For all other inquiries please call the main Guardian switchboard on 020 7278 2332.
· If you are writing a comment for publication, please mark clearly "for publication".




READ AN ALTERNATIVE IHT DAILY NARRATIVE AT
A PLACE IN THE AUVERGNE



International Herald Tribune
IHT
New York Times
NYT



Vacation /Business Trip Furnished Rental Apartment in Paris

IDG CEO: 'We Have to Create Something Entirely New for the Web' (Fishbowl)



Tuesday, Oct 14

Last week, we heard Bob Carrigan speak at the 2008 American Magazine Conference about making money in the online world. The CEO of IDG Communications worldwide had some interesting ideas, so earlier today we spoke with him by phone.
Carrigan, whose company publishes
GamePro, Mac World, PC World and a host of others, said that since IDG's publications are in the technology sector, the company "jumped in early and has been experimenting aggressively" on the Web. On the b-to-b side of the business, they are using their vast databases to develop lead generations that are then sold to marketers. This practice has been increasingly successful and lucrative.
Carrigan also spoke about his vision for magazine Web sites. "The industry talks a lot about the transition from print to online ... We have to create something entirely new for the Web," he said. "It's about creating something that's pure for the Web."
But how does one do that? Well, having your own global news service is a great start.

The IDG News Service is a "global new service" that "only syndicates news to internal IDG sites," he said.
Although its been around for upwards of 20 years — pre-Internet, it was used primarily to send news around the world for inclusion in the international editions of various magazines — the service has been instrumental in providing sites with interesting, constantly refreshed and original content. "[Our] brands will take the stories and make them their own," Carrigan said. "Most technology stories are relevant to their Web site."
IDG Web sites also rely on their users to create content. "We have very active communities that contribute content and insight," the CEO explained, while remarking that features from the print magazines make up less than one percent of the content on each site. The result is a "standalone" site that can "compete against pure play competitors."
In the near future, IDG — like so many other companies — will look to expand into the mobile realm. Having a presence in 85 countries helps this venture. "In the area of mobile, the U.S. is way behind," Carrigan said, noting that many developments in the mobile arena have come from IDG's outposts across the Atlantic.

READ AN ALTERNATIVE IHT DAILY NARRATIVE AT
A PLACE IN THE AUVERGNE



International Herald Tribune
IHT
New York Times
NYT

Vacation /Business Trip Furnished Apartment in Paris

Tuesday, 14 October 2008

MSM is so bloody SLOW: example this story on Mainstream News Outlets Start Linking to Other Sites




I have made many references on this blog to MSM sites, including the NYT, linking to other sites (link journalism- pity I didn't label them, which I will now start doing).

Good article, about this topic below from the NYT, but just so behind the news curve. This is really OLD news and I don't think there is anything in it that I didn't know already.

Re. the NYT and link journalism the main points are:


The New York Times is developing a version of the home page “that will contain links to other news sites and blogs alongside the articles we publish,” The Times’s chief technology officer, Marc Frons, told Web readers in July. That feature, called Times Extra, will be published using a technology called Blogrunner that the Times acquired in 2005.

I've also joined TimesPeople and can see some staff picks from NYT People, but by no means all. A search for example of Mr. Sulzberger and numerous other NYT editors does not show their involvement and there is no Staff Picks, so I am in the process of creating my own Staff Picks by searching on IHT and NYT journalists when I visit TimesPeople (got the photo problem resolved, so my score is now up to 6 out of 10, but as I posted about it, link journalism is a must for me to get the score up).


October 13, 2008
Mainstream News Outlets Start Linking to Other Sites
By
BRIAN STELTER
“Thou shalt not link to outside sites” — a long-held commandment of many newsrooms — is eroding.
Embracing the hyperlink ethos of the Web to a degree not seen before, news organizations are becoming more comfortable linking to competitors — acting in effect like aggregators. The Washington Post recently introduced a political Web site that recommends rival sites. This week
NBC will begin introducing Web sites for its local TV stations with links to local newspapers, radio stations, online videos and other sources. And The New York Times will soon offer its online readers an alternative home page with links to competitors.
These experiments exemplify “link journalism,” an idea that is gaining traction in other newsrooms across the country. “It is a fundamentally different mindset” for journalists, said Scott Karp, chief of the Web-based newswire
Publish2, who coined the term.
For years, newspapers, television station Web sites and magazines have hesitated about linking to outside Web sites because, the logic goes, they want to keep the users on their own site. More internal page views and longer time-spent-viewing can equate to larger advertising revenue for Web sites.
Mr. Karp argues that
Google, the leading search engine, is a direct rebuttal to that logic. “It’s all about sending people away, and it does such a good job of it that people keep coming back for more,” he said.
NBC hopes to benefit from the same user behavior. Beginning with its Chicago affiliate, WMAQ, on Monday, the company will turn its TV station Web sites into full-fledged city guides. John P. Wallace, the president of NBC’s local media division, said the partnerships with content providers and the links to third-party sites will “tap into our communities much deeper than we have been able to historically.”
“It’s a change in mindset,” he said. “We’re looking at the fragmented local market and saying, ‘We’re going to provide a destination where you can come and search across different segments.’ ”
Brian Buchwald, the division’s senior vice president for local digital media and multiplatform, said the move amounts to an acknowledgment that local television stations must do more online than merely regurgitate their newscasts online. “We need to be a lot more than just TV stations if we’re going to be relevant,” he said.
NBC’s local media operation has hired about 55 people to create original content and filter the Web. A test version of the Chicago site last week linked to The Chicago Sun-Times, USA Today,
TMZ and the local blog Chicagoist. The sites do not distinguish between the articles written by their own staff members and the links to outside sites.
“If we can provide them great content, that’s wonderful. If it comes from somebody else, that’s fine, too,” Mr. Buchwald said.
As simple as that sounds, it represents an attitude shift. While linking to other sources is not a new occurrence by any means, it can still seem misguided to journalists who work vigorously to break a story ahead of other news outlets.
Mr. Karp believes the use of blogs by news organizations has helped newsroom managers accept that filtering the Web for visitors is a valuable editorial function. For bloggers, linking to original reporting, primary sources and discussions about stories is a form of etiquette, assigning credit to others who have written about a topic.
Jeff Jarvis, a prominent blogger who directs the Graduate School of Journalism’s new-media program at the
City University of New York, has said that the culture of linking was creating a “new architecture of news.”
“Link unto others’ good stuff as you would have them link unto your good stuff,” he proposed in June. His “Golden Rule of Links” for journalists, naturally, earned at least 25 links from other bloggers.
Newsrooms seem more open than ever to that view.
The New York Times is developing a version of the home page “that will contain links to other news sites and blogs alongside the articles we publish,” The Times’s chief technology officer, Marc Frons, told Web readers in July. That feature, called Times Extra, will be published using a technology called Blogrunner that the Times acquired in 2005.
Other Web sites are aggregating links manually: ProPublica, the nonprofit newsroom venture led by
Paul Steiger, the former managing editor of The Wall Street Journal, has dedicated a section of its site to “Breaking on the Web,” a collection of links to the investigative reporting of others.
Last month The Washington Post added
“Political Browser,” a professed source of “what’s good on the Web,” to its site. The page freely links to competitors with features like “Required Reading,” summing up articles in newspapers and magazines, and “Staff Picks,” a list of articles that Post employees are reading. Lest its own newspaper be forgotten, a “Best of the Post” section links to its own articles.





READ AN ALTERNATIVE IHT DAILY NARRATIVE AT
A PLACE IN THE AUVERGNE


International Herald Tribune
IHT
New York Times
NYT

Monday, 13 October 2008

Good digital idea - show me the money: Twitter.


Just in case you don't know, here's the simple answer to what is Twitter:


What are you doing?


It's none of your fucking business is not the reaction of two million users worldwide. However, they aren't yet making any money....which is the business of the people who stumped up $15million to get it flying. And in the current climate, pressure must be on for a return.
Here's Slate on it all.






Tweeter Pan
By chadwick.matlin
Created 10/08/2008 - 1:14pm
For months, tech writers have marveled at
Twitter [1]'s quirky success. One-hundred and forty characters at a time, the company has brought in more than 2 million users [2], 2 million monthly page views [3], and $15 million in venture capital [4]. Especially in the last few months, the microblogging, instant-messaging, social-networking platform has gone mainstream.
As Twitter has made the leap to the masses, a fundamental, quantitative question has
started [5] to [6] percolate [2] among technoscribes: How the hell is Twitter going to make money? Behind that query, though, is another that often goes unasked in today's Silicon Valley: Does Twitter even want to make money in the first place? Or is it all peer pressure?
Plenty of people have played armchair CFO and tried to graft a business model onto the service. The advice: Twitter should
start using banner ads [7] (as they already do in Japan [8]), charge for pro accounts [7] that guarantee uninterrupted service, insert text ads midfeed [9] a la Facebook, and/or sell data to advertisers so they can narrowcast ads based on what you and friends are Tweeting about (a tactic that social networks employ [10]). That's not all-the Twitterverse, blogosphere, and mainstream media have plenty of other pearls of wisdom to share.
Through all the noise, Twitter has made it clear that it's in no rush to start making money. Co-founder
Evan Williams told TechCrunch [11] last month that Twitter has "thought about" its revenue model, but that "it's not actively in development right now." Williams floats a few ideas about how to monetize, but they're sketchy. He suggested similarly murky ideas in 2007 [5], but the company hasn't moved forward with its revenue model since then.
Twitter gets the revenue question so often, it devotes part of its
press room FAQ [12] to the monetization question:
Twitter has many appealing opportunities for generating revenue but we are holding off on implementation for now because we don't want to distract ourselves from the more important work at hand which is to create a compelling service and great user experience for millions of people around the world.
The Big Money interviewed
Biz Stone [13], another Twitter co-founder, who recently told Portfolio [14] that focusing on a revenue stream would be "a distraction." We wanted to know whether this was all an act, whether Twitter was really just keeping plans close to the vest. So: How often do folks sit down to talk about a revenue model. Once a week? Once a month? It's never discussed, Stone said.
Why not? Because Twitter, according to Stone, still isn't "sustainable." Stone used the S-word as an excuse repeatedly during our chat, as if it were a safety blanket made out of chainmail. Twitter wants to have both a sustainable product and business plan before it starts to capitalize on its community. The product bit makes some sense-for months Twitter's service had been plagued with glitches. But
Twitter's servers have been performing relatively well [15] for the last few months, so maybe sustainability has been achieved.
Stone's other comment—that Twitter needed a sustainable business model—was more troublesome. Here, sustainability entails finding revenue without alienating current or future users, a common refrain among Web 2.0 folk. Facebook's ill-fated Beacon advertising platform
failed while trying to find that balance [16]. Williams told Download Squad [5], "Our top concern when it comes to monetization will be to do so in a way that does not negatively impact users." So instead of experimenting with a business model that might accomplish that goal, Twitter's founders continue to lounge within the comfortable status quo.
There may be a deeper, psychological reason that Twitter can't follow the dollar. It may have a Peter Pan complex-it just doesn't want to grow up. Pan ultimately chooses Never Never Land because he is worried about the pains adulthood will invite into his life. For now, Twitter is choosing to do the same.
Because Twitter is so resolute in its nonmonetization, it has earned a certain amount of respect among tech entrepreneurs. They're the champions of an improbable and absurd scenario: Imagine, a company restricts its users' self-expression, builds a global community, and raises millions of dollars. It's impressive enough that somebody actually pulled it off. Even more impressive, though, would be if the geniuses who gamed the system then chose not to reap the monetary benefits. It's a brand of asceticism one can find only in Silicon Valley, and even there only in selected pockets.
It wouldn't be the end of the Internet economy if Twitter chose to go Craigslist's route and
operated as a nonprofit disguised as a for-profit [17]. But it can't. In order to get to where it is today, the site had to raise money from venture capitalists—$15.1 million [18] worth. In exchange for the booster shot, the investors demand a considerable return on investment. That means Twitter is going to actually have to try to make some money at some point. Also of note: To get the venture capitalists onboard, Twitter's leaders presumably had to show some type of business plan, so we assume somebody, somewhere, is doing some (private) thinking about monetization.
So, Twitter's dilemma has taken the shape of an
Ouroboros [19]. The soul of the site is still rooted in the community ethos of the idyllic Web. Trying to make money off the service, they fear, will alienate the community and rob the service of its plucky aura. But in order to build the best product possible, it needs investment capital. And with investors comes a responsibility to turn a profit (whether by revenue or a buyout). But turning a profit means monetizing the community. And monetizing the community means stripping the aura. Around and around we go.
I asked Stone whether the two forces-idealism and capitalism-are mutually exclusive. He assured me they were not and that there's a way to live within both worlds. Google, of course, is the shining example of a tech company that has figured out how to straddle the boundary. For now, though, Stone and Twitter are firmly rooted in only one, too comfortable to try and find that happy medium. Some friendly, parental advice: It's tough to grow up without taking a few leaps of faith.

Source URL:
http://tbm.thebigmoney.com/articles/monetize/2008/10/08/tweeter-pan
Links:[1] http://www.twitter.com/

























READ AN ALTERNATIVE IHT DAILY NARRATIVE AT
A PLACE IN THE AUVERGNE


International Herald Tribune
IHT
New York Times
NYT

The Atlantic Redesigns Both Online and in Print (Fishbowl)




The Atlantic, the 150 year old magazine that has managed to make itself relevant online, has a new look! The Atlantic's online relevance is, in our opinion, largely due to its line-up of stellar bloggers (our affinity for Andrew Sullivan is no secret, however, Marc Ambinder is also a staple and anyone not already reading Ta-Nahisi Coates should begin immediately), and apparenly as part of the redesign each has been assigned their own color (Andrew has a shade of blue, Megan McArdle green, Ta-Nehisi silver).In a post on the homepage editor James Bennet explained to readers what other changes they may encounter at both the site and the print magazine.
Per Bennet's announcement post:
graphic designer Michael Bierut and his team at the design firm Pentagram adapted a logo that The Atlantic used for more than 35 years in the middle of the last century.
Navigation on the site remains the same, with one exception. On the navigation bar, we've substituted "Dispatches" for "The Current." As regular visitors have probably noticed, along with the short commentaries we've been doing under the heading "The Current," we've also been doing more and more reported and analytical dispatches on the site, and it seemed sensible to combine them all into one category. "The Current" may return down the road in a different form, as one of several new features we're planning in the coming months.
Next week, when the November issue reaches subscribers, they'll see that we've substantially restructured the magazine. I'll have more to say about that then...But our striking yet familiar nameplate hints at our overall direction. Both on the Web and in print, we set out with this redesign to recommit ourselves to the tradition of The Atlantic as the home for bold, original thinking and writing, while keeping ourselves in sync with a world that needs that kind of work as much as it ever has.

READ AN ALTERNATIVE IHT DAILY NARRATIVE AT
A PLACE IN THE AUVERGNE


International Herald Tribune
IHT
New York Times
NYT


Vacation /Business Trip Furnished Apartment in Paris

Amid the gloom, an e-commerce war (IHT)


Jeffrey Bezos of Amazon, left, has long emphasized experiments like third-party selling. John Donahoe of eBay is shifting the company away from auctions. (Stuart Isett, left, and Peter DaSilva for The New York Times)

Amid the gloom, an e-commerce war
By Brad Stone
Sunday, October 12, 2008
WHEN the e-commerce giant eBay emerged from the last recession seven years ago with an aura of invincibility, its chief executive, Meg Whitman, boasted that "eBay is to some extent recession-proof."
As the online auctioneer's revenues and stock price kept climbing, one of its primary rivals, Amazon.com, just limped along.
How times have changed.
Whitman, now co-chair of Senator John McCain's presidential campaign, retired from eBay earlier this year as the company struggled with stagnation. Amazon, meanwhile, has emerged as one of the most vibrant and reliable retailers in the country.
And in an unmistakable sign that Internet companies are indeed exposed to the gathering economic storm stemming from the credit crisis, Whitman's successor, John Donahoe, laid off 10 percent of eBay's 16,000 employees last Monday.
Donahoe noted that eBay was already feeling the effects of the downturn. "This looks like it is going to be a more typical economic cycle that impacts consumer spending," he said. "We are not immune."
That the economic crisis is washing up on Silicon Valley's shores shouldn't, perhaps, come as a surprise. Most tech companies are defenseless against waning advertising, business spending and consumer interest in big-ticket items like computers. Over the last three months, investors have punished tech companies like Google, Microsoft and Apple, extracting a fifth to a half of their market value.
E-commerce, though, was once thought to be a refuge from economic storms. People who stay away from the mall might actually be more tempted to shop online and hunt for deals, or so the thinking went.
But analysts are now revisiting that assumption. Many consumers, citing an uncertain economy, say they will clutch their wallets tightly this holiday season regardless of where they shop: 48 percent surveyed recently by eBillme, an online payment service, said they planned to delay purchases.
Traditional, brick-and-mortar stores had wrenching, double-digit declines in September sales and are bracing for a bleak holiday season. No one is certain to what degree online retailers will feel that same pain, because digital vendors have never endured a deep, protracted economic slump before.
"We still feel pretty good about this year, but I worry about next year and beyond," said Brian Pitz, an analyst at Banc of America Securities. "Are people going to spend when they can't get home equity lines of credit, a student loan or a car loan?"
For eBay and Amazon, the twin giants of e-commerce, the financial meltdown has arrived at a particularly crucial time. After years of claiming that their businesses were complementary, not competitive, the companies are now on a collision course.
Amazon has accelerated its courtship of small online vendors, allowing them to sell on its site — becoming more like eBay. And eBay, desperate to revive itself, has decided to emphasize traditional, fixed-price sales of both new and old merchandise — becoming more like Amazon.
AT stake is more than e-commerce bragging rights. On the Internet, size matters. Larger companies can collect more information about consumers, negotiate better deals with partners and use that leverage to expand their dominance (for example, Google versus Yahoo in search).
"This is a pivotal holiday season for eBay," said Jeffrey Lindsay, a senior analyst at Bernstein Research who has covered the Internet for a decade. "What people fear is that Amazon is basically building a bigger sales base than eBay and will use that knowledge to sell people more and more of the things they want to buy online."
Indeed, the balance of power in e-commerce seems to be shifting faster than anyone expected. Just three years ago, eBay had 30 percent more traffic than Amazon. Today, its total of 84.5 million active users is barely ahead of the 81 million active customer accounts that Amazon reported in June.
Amazon has exceeded eBay in other measures as well.
EBay's market capitalization was three times Amazon's in 2005, back when Wall Street loved the fact that it carried no inventory and generated huge profits. This year, eBay's stock has lost over half its value and, in July, Amazon's valuation surpassed eBay's for the first time.
In a series of interviews, Donahoe acknowledged that eBay, based in San Jose, California, didn't adapt fast enough to shifting e-commerce winds. He now embraces a "turnaround mind-set" and is refocusing its Web marketplace toward shoppers who don't want to waste time in online auctions.
"There are times when I wish we can close this store and just open a new store, but we can't," he said. "We need to make bolder, more aggressive changes to the eBay ecosystem even if they are unpopular."
Up in Seattle, meanwhile, Amazon's chief executive, Jeffrey Bezos, says that after years of failed experimentation, third-party vendors — the foundation on which eBay was built — now account for about 29 percent of sales on Amazon. The company has endured and outlasted critics who long complained about its high fixed costs.
Last year, it impressed investors with accelerating growth, and its stock price revisited the highs of the dot-com boom, before waning euphoria and market pessimism erased more than half of those gains this year. Bezos credits Amazon's tolerance for risky, expensive bets like the Kindle electronic reading device.
"Our willingness to be misunderstood, our long-term orientation and our willingness to repeatedly fail are the three parts of our culture that make doing this kind of thing possible," he said.
EBay's recent problems have made Bezos and his team look like shrewd and patient stewards of the Amazon franchise. And Amazon's second wind is making eBay look as if it has missed one of the greatest opportunities in the Internet's short history.
"EBay could have closed the door to Amazon back when Amazon was mostly just a platform to sell books and music," said Scott Devitt, an analyst at Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, the investment bank. "But what eBay did in those days was to take a very hands-off approach and let the marketplace control itself. And that ended up being the downfall of the business relative to others that have succeeded."
OVER the summer of 2004, at the annual executive retreat that eBay insiders call "Telluride," a product strategy team argued that eBay needed to break into the promising world of digital media. Pointing to the popularity of services like Napster and the new iTunes music store from Apple, the group predicted that media like books, music and movies would inevitably be distributed digitally, over the Web.
EBay, they argued, needed to ride that wave.
That insight — which did catch on at Amazon and is now responsible for high-profile efforts like the Kindle and Amazon's MP3 store and video-on-demand service — went nowhere at eBay.
"Nobody really shut it down. The process shut it down," says a former eBay executive who was on the product strategy team but requested anonymity to avoid alienating former colleagues. "The company was obsessed with making quarterly numbers."
Whether passing on digital media was a mistake at eBay is still an open question. But the anecdote illustrates larger problems. More than a dozen current and former eBay executives, from all levels of management, say eBay routinely failed to reorient its core business.
They say eBay avoided fiddling with its auction model because it was wary of disrupting a long-profitable equilibrium between buyers and sellers.
EBay has known for years that some Web buyers were looking for a different experience. Surveys suggested that auction participants were alienated by untrustworthy sellers and hidden shipping fees, and increasingly preferred the certainty of instantly buying items at a fixed price.
Although eBay executives recognized and routinely acknowledged the problem, they never took bold, direct steps to address it.
In 2005, the company acquired Shopping.com, a comparative shopping site that catalogs products for sale elsewhere on the Web. But for years eBay did not promote the company's listings, primarily because its vocal community of sellers — the ones paying fees to eBay — protested whenever eBay sent buyers to other retailers.
Josh Koppelman, who founded the e-commerce site Half.com and sold it to eBay in 2001, says that there was an understandable cultural reluctance inside eBay to alienate sellers. "We got paid a fee to provide a service to a community," he said. "Hurting members of that community was difficult."
Instead of imposing critical fixes to its slowing model, eBay searched for high-growth businesses elsewhere, acquiring Skype, the online calling service; StubHub, the ticketing site; and a series of classified-advertising Web sites.
The company did create a whole new site, called eBay Express, where it tried to satisfy buyer interest in a simpler shopping experience. EBay Express automatically amassed all the fixed-price, non-auction listings on eBay properties and presented them in an organized way with only one payment system, PayPal — also owned by eBay.
But in the two-year life of eBay Express, eBay never directed any meaningful traffic to it, fearing that it would interfere with the more profitable and popular auction-oriented site. The company shuttered eBay Express this year and has said it will move some of its innovative features to eBay.com.
Contributing to intransigence, according to several former executives, were deep divisions and constant hand-wringing among its managers over the most fundamental question: What is eBay?
One camp believed that eBay was a discount palace and that it had to continually offer deals to buyers in whatever shopping format they wanted.
But another group, resistant to change even as late as last year when eBay was clearly losing ground, believed that the brand was tied up in the excitement of auctions. Emphasizing traditional shopping destroyed what made eBay special, they argued.
"Today online shopping is mainstream, but it's also becoming boring," Bill Cobb, then the president of eBay North America, wrote in a June 2007 blog entry that typified this thinking. "We're investing in the quintessential eBay experience of buying and selling — person to person — in an auction format."
Whitman seemed to moderate this constant debate while never actually settling it. At times, she also seemed unwilling to leave auctions behind.
In an interview last week, while on a break from traveling with the Republican vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin, Whitman said it was hard for her to reflect on these kinds of divisions within the company, or on missed opportunities.
"There was no shortage of realistic looks in the mirror, where we asked ourselves if we were doing the best job that we could do," she said.
She also addressed another notion raised by former eBayers, who say executives were dismissive of Amazon but focused obsessively on Google, the search leader whose tentative moves into e-commerce were viewed inside eBay as acts of aggression.
"Google is a disruptive competitor. It's not a marketplace and it's not a retailer but has a different way of marrying buyers and sellers," she said. "I don't think you can overstate any competitive threats."
But paranoia about Google, these former executives say, fueled strategic missteps like the Skype acquisition, which Google had also pursued. Whitman and other eBay managers spent considerable energy trying to integrate Skype, and last year eBay wrote down $1.4 billion of the $3.1 billion acquisition.
As eBay obsessed about Google, the online retailer from Seattle was encroaching on its turf.
CONVERSATIONS with Jeff Bezos of Amazon inevitably provoke two kinds of outbursts. One is that famous, barking laugh that punctuates even seemingly mundane sentences. The other is his paean to the wisdom of long-term thinking.
"We are willing to plant seeds that take five to seven years to grow into reasonable things," he said in an interview. "You can't do big, clean-sheet invention unless you are willing to invest for long periods of time."
Bezos has delivered these kinds of odes to patience and risk tolerance for nearly a decade. The company's appetite for enduring short-term pain for long-term gain is clearest when comparing it with its rival, eBay.
While eBay was buying into classified advertising, online payments and Internet telephony, Amazon spent hundreds of millions of dollars building its brand as a trusted retailer — hiring customer service representatives and returning money to customers when transactions went awry.
As eBay took a pass on digital media, Amazon dove in and frustrated investors for years with margins that were diminished by a bulky R&D budget — but produced promising businesses like the MP3 store.
Compensation at the two companies also reflects core differences. Amazon evaluates its executives annually and gives performance-based stock grants. Until this year, when Donahoe became chief executive, eBay gave cash and stock bonuses based on quarterly performance, rewarding managers for meeting Wall Street's short-term expectations.
Similarly, Amazon's push to recruit the small sellers who orbited eBay was marked, at first, by patience and often-embarrassing experimentation.
In 1999, five years after Bezos first plunged his stake into the ground as an online bookseller, Amazon invaded eBay's territory, introducing Amazon Auctions and a way for retailers to set up stores on the site, called zShops. The efforts tanked.
The problem then "was that nobody came," Bezos said. "Actually, sellers came, but the customers didn't care and didn't shop there."
Amazon tried to promote this siloed merchandise on its site by linking to it on its more popular product pages. These so-called "smart links" were hotly controversial inside Amazon and became the subject of a rivalry between its retail and technology groups.
Fearful that sending visitors to other pages would cut into their sales, retailing executives at Amazon took to removing them from the page at every opportunity, according to one senior Amazon executive who was there at the time.
SEVERAL years ago, the company introduced Amazon Marketplace, laying the groundwork for its current path by listing new and used items from third-party sellers alongside its own merchandise.
If Amazon didn't stock a particular item, or if independent sellers could offer better prices, they would become the featured retailer on the page.
Amazon settled internal tensions by giving its retail managers credit for any products sold on their pages, even by third-party sellers. But Bezos says the arrangement still produces anxiety.
"Put yourself in place of our retail buyers," he said. "You just purchased 10,000 units of a particular digital camera and you are told, if any third party anywhere in the world can offer a better price, we are going to give them the buy box and you are going to get stuck with the inventory. That causes some angst."
Over the last five years, Amazon has lowered hurdles for independent vendors to sell on its site and recruited new groups of merchants as it has expanded into other countries and product categories — automotive parts in 2006 and office supplies this year, for example.
Amazon executives say they don't specifically pursue top eBay sellers, but some merchants suggest otherwise.
David Duong, founder of Shoe Metro, a Web retailer based in San Diego, says Amazon representatives called him shortly after Amazon.com introduced a shoe category in 2005 and asked him to begin selling on the site.
"I guess they found us on eBay," he said. "We were actually going to talk to them, but they beat us to the punch."
Lately, small merchants and their trade organizations say, the outreach has become even more direct. The Professional EBay Sellers Alliance said that Amazon recently offered to waive some fees for the 800 members of the group, an organization of eBay power sellers, to woo them to its platform.
Because Amazon also sells many of the same products as its merchants, executives at eBay predict that competitive tensions will emerge as the Amazon Marketplace grows. Maybe so. It's happened before.
Amazon once ran the Web operations of large traditional retailers like Borders, Circuit City and Toys "R" Us. One by one, those retailers concluded that outsourcing such a crucial feature of 21st-century retailing to a competitor was a bad idea.
But some of its newer deals with sellers indicate that Amazon is finding ways around those tensions, at least with small merchants.
Andrew and Deb Mowery of Fort Collins, Colorado, who started selling home, garden and pet supplies on eBay in 1999, now make 60 percent of their sales on Amazon and about 20 percent on eBay. In addition to listing items for sale on the Amazon Marketplace, they are also a wholesale supplier to Amazon, providing it with products like heated pet beds.
Mowery is essentially competing with himself, but the arrangement works. "If they run out, I've got their back," he said. "If I run out, they've got my back."
Amazon wants to forge these kinds of close ties with other small sellers. A program called Fulfillment by Amazon, introduced in 2006, allows retailers to store their inventory in Amazon's warehouses. When someone buys an item from that seller, Amazon ships it out of its warehouse in an Amazon box.
Integrating small merchants into its operations also allows Amazon to learn more about whom it can trust to sell on its site. Compared with eBay, the company says it exerts a far greater measure of control over its marketplace, calling certain vendors "featured sellers" and vetting others in product categories that are sensitive to fraud.
"At the end of the day, we believe it's good for all of our sellers to make sure we are protecting the consumer experience first," Bezos said. "Our first and foremost goal is to earn trust with consumers. If there are no consumers buying, nothing else matters."
DESPITE Amazon's success in courting independent sellers, its selection is still just a fraction of what eBay offers, and in some cases its prices are higher.
For example, there are hundreds of new, used and refurbished Trek racing bikes on eBay; as of last week, Amazon had three for sale. Acquisitive parents can buy a $90 Deux Par Deux baby sweater dress on eBay for under $30. But only a few of this French designer's items are listed on Amazon, and for close to full price.
And that Lehman Brothers 150th-anniversary collectible tote bag, which every irony-obsessed stock market fan wants under the Christmas tree? It is available for purchase only on eBay, in auctions.
This is where Donahoe talks about a vision to fix eBay, and to create a Web discount store that offers a wide variety of new and old merchandise in auction and fixed-price formats. To get there, he must administer the sweeping, painful fixes that eBay has previously shunned.
"It was increasingly clear to me in 2007 that what felt like bold changes, and to the community felt like bold changes, were not bold enough," he said.
His attempted fixes have started internally. In addition to making executive bonuses annual instead of quarterly, to keep employees from leaving and reward longer-term thinking, he moved the company's focus to buyers instead of sellers.
He canceled the annual eBay Live conference next year with merchants — this year, it turned into an unwieldy complaint session — and began making eBay executives read weekly surveys that ask shoppers whether they would recommend eBay to a friend.
THE eBay facade is also undergoing its most significant renovation in its 14-year history as Donahoe tries to adjust eBay fees to tempt sellers to list more of their products at fixed prices.
EBay has also added a new 30-day listing at a fixed price that is more economical to many sellers than auctions. It has also disabled the feedback mechanism that allowed sellers to rank buyers and introduced a new "best match" search engine that promotes trusted sellers and good deals.
In another controversial change, eBay has struck special deals with large merchants like Buy.com, which pays no listing fees and offers more than half a million products on eBay.com.
The point of the arrangement is to ensure that eBay stays fully stocked in basics like batteries and printer cartridges. Other eBay sellers are enraged, though, arguing that the deal violates the sacred eBay tenet of the "level playing field."
These sellers have vented their frustrations online about eBay's changes. It's hard to gauge whether the vitriol represents the majority view, but some less vocal, larger sellers on eBay say they have actually benefited.
"EBay has told all bad sellers to shape up," said Jordan Insley, an electronics merchant who lives near Seattle. "I've seen a lot of sellers that used to sell a lot of product fall off the charts."
Although he worries that buyer traffic on eBay is slowing, Insley says he will sell $13 million in gadgets this year on eBay alone. "I think eBay is moving in the right direction. We are sticking around."
Still, Donahoe can't count on that sentiment to carry the day. Few of his changes are expected to deliver any immediate results, other than alienating certain sellers.
Yet for eBay, the changes may be a matter of survival. The company need only look across Silicon Valley at Yahoo to see what can happen to wounded Internet companies with depressed stock prices.
In the meantime, he faces tough choices. He is weighing a possible sale of Skype by next year, and analysts think he will almost certainly make that move, since the company now acknowledges that Skype has little synergy with eBay's other businesses.
That would free eBay to focus on its core marketplace, on getting through the torrential economic downpour, and on combating a challenger that is making greater incursions every day.
"I respect Jeff Bezos a lot as a leader and Amazon and what they've done," Donahoe said. "But it is still early days in this industry. E-commerce is 7 percent of retail. I don't think anyone thinks it's going to end there. We think there is plenty of room for both Amazon and eBay to be successful."







READ AN ALTERNATIVE IHT DAILY NARRATIVE AT
A PLACE IN THE AUVERGNE


International Herald Tribune
IHT
New York Times
NYT


Vacation /Business Trip Furnished Apartment in Paris

Sunday, 12 October 2008

You have a good Internet idea but you're not out of the woods

I've been reflecting on Internet acquisitions or business development ideas for the NYT Company.

This post is just to remind me that first movers are always followed, so when you move first, if you move first, make sure you move fast and furious.



Admiral's confused.com margins squeezed and shares down
Reuters
Friday, October 10, 2008
Motor insurer Admiral Group said on Friday that competitive pressures continue to weigh on its price comparison website confused.com, helping send its stock to a three-month low.
The group said it expects at least to meet forecasts of a 9.9 percent rise in profit this year, but said margins at confused.com remained under pressure, with turnover from the website over the first nine months of 2008 in line with the same period last year.
Confused.com, which accounted for 20 percent of group profit in 2007, has been hit by growing competition from new entrants to the price comparison market.
By 11:40 a.m., Admiral shares were down 11.7 percent at 797.5 pence, having fallen as low as 772p, their lowest since July. The FTSE 100 share index was 8.2 percent lower, weighed down by weakness in financial stocks amid mounting fears that the credit crunch will trigger a global recession.
Admiral shares have fallen 19 percent since the beginning of the year.
Numis Securities analyst Richard Gradidge said the company's outlook for in-line nine-month turnover at confused.com implied that the unit's revenues had fallen in the third quarter, offsetting an increase reported at the half-year stage.
"There are a couple of things in the statement that may have disappointed. Confused is starting to see revenue reductions," Gradidge said.
Admiral is expected to report a 2008 pretax profit of 200.1 million pounds, up 9.9 percent from 182.1 million pounds the previous year, according to the average of seven analysts' estimates collected by the company.
"We are on track to hit or exceed analysts' consensus profit estimates for 2008. Despite all the turmoil in the financial markets, Admiral had another good quarter," Admiral Chief Executive Henry Engelhardt said in a statement.
Admiral, which sells car insurance through the Admiral, Bell, Diamond and Elephant.co.uk brands, said it had 1.71 million car insurance customers as of September 30, a 17 percent increase from a year earlier.
That helped push group turnover for the first nine months of the year up 13 percent to 718 million pounds.
Admiral's Engelhardt said the company had also benefited from price increases and lower insurance claims. "Prices are moving up while claim trends are leading to improved profitability," Engelhardt said, without providing further detail.

READ AN ALTERNATIVE IHT DAILY NARRATIVE AT
A PLACE IN THE AUVERGNE

International Herald Tribune
IHT
New York Times
NYT

Friday, 3 October 2008

Here's a man who might dig Newspaper 2.0

Kevin Ryan


If you want to cut to the (unpleasant) chase, scroll to bottom and read his answer to last question.

Forbes: Online News
Up Ryan's Alley
James Erik Abels 10.02.08, 6:30 PM ET

Kevin Ryan was CEO of DoubleClick when a private equity firm bought it for $1.1 billion in 2005 (Microsoft bought it for $3.1 billion two years later). What'd he do with his winnings? Among other things, he joined a new wave of publishers building Web news businesses.
So far, so good. Last month, Quantcast reports Ryan's one-year-old Silicon Alley Insider had roughly 630,000 unique visitors. A big part of the attraction: Editor-in-Chief Henry Blodgett, one of the highest-flying analysts of the 1990s before he crashed amid an ethics scandal that left him banned for life from the securities industry.

Today, Blodgett runs three sites--with more on the way--under the banner of Ryan's Alley Corp., a New York-based incubator for six digital businesses, which Ryan says have combined annual revenues of $50 million.
Forbes.com checked in with him for his take on the market ahead and the opportunity for digital media.


Forbes.com: How do you expect advertising to hold up in the short term?
Ryan: It's going to be terrible. I'm only hearing bad things. I just had lunch with one of the top luxury-goods providers; he runs the U.S. for them. He said, starting September: catastrophe.
How does that affect your building digital news business?
We're so small that--although that is a factor--when you're tiny and you have a tiny market share, what's important is: Are you doubling in size?
How well has that strategy worked to date?
Revenues have doubled for us since June. Small numbers, but … if you have 10 people [as does Silicon Alley Media], roughly you're spending a million dollars a year.
Does that equal profitability?
Not yet--however, if we weren't launching other publications then we'd be awfully close right now. When we start a new one, you have two new people on it, you have no traffic, you're eating all those costs.
How long are you willing to eat those costs?
In the first year, we focused almost 100% on just establishing our brand name, getting people to read it, getting people to care about that. In the second year, we start now to focus on monetization and aspects like that. It's pointless to work on monetization when you have very little traffic.
If a goal is just a couple million dollars, that's still paltry next to what print brings in--even as the entire traditional media sector declines.
Online is more scalable, it's not easy to make money. The challenge in online publishing is [that] the market's not enormous right now. It's not. Your goal has to be that you're going to build a business that requires very little capital, but could be a good business that's worth $50 million.
Then where does digital media live within the news industry? Does it become a supplement to leaner but more financially valuable print publications?
I'm saying print goes away, I'm saying the industry shrinks [and earns less money]. I don't think it [ever] matches print revenues. It has lower costs--I do think there's a net transformation here.
So in the future, there's just less money in news and other forms of publishing?
The revenues are smaller. You don't have capital costs, you just have people writing and collecting [aggregating content on a single Web site]. Think of the music business. They were extorting monopoly profits because they had monopoly distribution.
Then the Internet doesn't shift existing media businesses online, it guts them?
Here we have open distribution.
That puts a lot of pressure on a start-up's small staff to generate a content volume that sells enough advertising to earn the small returns you're talking about.
I think that is a real challenge for people. You just have to manage it as best you can. It's not easy. I don't think we have an innovative great solution for that other than to be thinking about it and trying to manage it as best we can because you do want productivity.
Traditional media companies have tended toward being overstaffed but do a better job with this issue.
If the economy cools off, don't you think that gives the industry some time to begin incorporating more digital media into a business that scales?
Big media is irrelevant, really, in what happens, because they're not the driver of anything. They buy some companies and they adopt what's out there a little bit late. Look at the top 50 Web sites online: Tell me if big media created any of them.




READ AN ALTERNATIVE IHT DAILY NARRATIVE AT
A PLACE IN THE AUVERGNE

International Herald Tribune
IHT
New York Times
NYT

Monday, 29 September 2008

Les Moonves Wants to Put Newspapers Out of Business (Wired)

Yeah? You and whose army Les?
Anyone notice something about my blog?
Just to prove a point I steal content and you don't see the advertising on any of the sites I steal it from. Welcome to your Internet model Les, it's working for sure.


Les Moonves Wants to Put Newspapers Out of Business

By Meghan Keane September 23, 2008 12:25:05 PM


Leslie Moonves says the purchase of CNET instantly made CBS a "major player" in the digital realm -- and delights in his company's contribution to the death of the daily newspaper.
CBS aims to leverage its purchase of the technology network to shift the company away from being an "old media company": "We could build over the course of a decade, or buy CNET and become instantaneously a major player," the CBS president and CEO told an audience at MIXX 2.8, The Interactive Advertising Bureau's annnual advertising conference.
The CBS CEO plans to position his company as a one stop shop for news and information, potentially eliminating the need for dead tree media. “One of the advantages of the Internet is we’re taking money away from the newspapers,” he said gleefully.
Though initially nervous about implementing CBS's new "everywhere" approach to content, Moonves now sees broadcasting content across multiple platforms as a plus. He says: “The future of the internet is as a lab for the network.”


A PLACE IN THE AUVERGNE


International Herald Tribune
IHT
New York Times
NYT


Vacation /Business Trip Furnished Apartment in Paris

How the competition to the NYT earn their keep (Folio)

Interesting to note that, when speaking about presumably US media buyers, Time publisher thinks that agencies cling to circulation and not audience. "Agencies cling to circulation because it gives them a proven negotiating tactic,” he says.


If only the advertising director of the IHT could say the same about the world he lives in.




FOLIO: Show '08: How Time Earns its Audience
Online will be 30-35 percent of total revenue but print remains 'big engine.'

By Matt Kinsman 09/23/2008



CHICAGOTime magazine has more than 3 million readers in print and currently does 82 million page views online, and president and worldwide publisher Ed McCarrick thinks the brand can “easily do 200 million page views” online in the near future. “We must be constantly innovative to earn audience back each day,” said McCarrick, who delivered the opening keynote at the FOLIO: Show here today.

Online advertising revenue currently accounts for about 10 percent of overall revenue at Time and is projected to grow by 57 percent in 2008 and another 35 percent to 40 percent in 2009, according McCarrick.

While McCarrick thinks online will eventually account for 30 percent to 35 percent of overall revenue, “offline revenue is still the big engine.” Still, one medium is leveraged with another. “We’re putting together a multifaceted approach and it’s no longer clean in terms of one media being separate from another.”


Beyond the Red Border

Taking the Time audience “beyond the red border”—referring to the magazine’s famous cover margin—is key for the publisher, according to McCarrick. The magazine “broke down barriers between news breakers and the audience” by opening up its popular 10 Questions feature, in which Time staffers ask noted individuals 10 questions, to the readership, who can ask questions online and read the responses in a variety of media, from print to online to video on YouTube and audio files on iTunes. Rather than attempt to scratch out print revenue while depending on online and events for all new growth, Time made big changes in the way it delivers its print magazine. The shift in delivery from Monday to Friday wasn’t about cutting costs but adapting to how the audience consumes media, McCarrick said. “From Monday to Friday, moment-to-moment, the Web site does the heavy lifting,” he said. “On the weekend, then relax and they’re open to spending time with long-form analysis. We didn’t do this because to cut costs, we actually incurred considerable costs for printing and delivery. This brings the magazine closer to the consumer.” In March 2009, Time will introduce new print package called “Health & Wellness,” targeting 1 million women. “We hope this will take off as a standalone supplement that we can possibly offer quarterly,” says McCarrick.


Agencies Resist Audience Guarantee

McCarrick said that by lowering its ratebase Time has been able to improve profits. “We’re not chasing marginal subscriptions,” he added.However, McCarrick expressed disappointment that ad agencies and media buyers haven’t embraced Time’s audience guarantee, which was intended to move the magazine in line with how other media around world (including international editions) are evaluated—on audience, rather than circulation. “Until we shift from circulation to audience, we won’t be evaluated on an even level with other media,” said McCarrick. “But agencies haven’t taken us up on this. Agencies cling to circulation because it gives them a proven negotiating tactic.”


International Herald Tribune
IHT
New York Times
NYT

Friday, 8 August 2008

How are things going for ex-IHT web exec Meredith Artley?

Quite well, would seem to be the answer.



Readers' Representative Journal -->
« Ombudsmen columns Main Reporter, readers and the man in the story meet online »

Monthly web report: 127 million page views for July

The performance of latimes.com, and recent developments there, are covered in this memo to staff from Executive Editor for Interactive Meredith Artley:
Colleagues:


We can’t say the summers are slow anymore. Latimes.com set an all-time record of 127 million page views for July, cruising past the previous record of 120 million set in May. That’s 66% growth from this time last year. More than 19 million unique users visited in July, another all-timer.

We were on track to break that May record by a few million page views, and then the earthquake happened, pushing us even further ahead.

You’ll see more traffic driving elements in the most-viewed lists below.

But there are other reasons for the growth.

We’re using technology and the Web at large to spread our journalism far and wide. Latimes.com keeps getting better at SEO (search engine optimization), which means our stories are ranking higher in Google and other search engines. We are also performing better on sites like Digg.com.

All that adds up to more exposure and more readership than ever before.


Other highlights of the month included the launch of
Hero Complex, the new sci-fi and beyond blog featuring Geoff Boucher and other print and Web contributors.

Hero Complex was the home for our outstanding Comic-Con coverage, with great live blogging, creative video and exclusive interviews.

Also, Eric Ulken and the “cool kids” team took a break from their hard news database work and launched a fun database of L.A. dog names and breeds. Some great work went into the “Big Burn” fire series.

And to top it off, latimes.com is a finalist in four categories for the Online
Journalism Awards:
Breaking News – October Wildfires
Multimedia –
Burnover
Outstanding Use of Digital Technologies --
California War Dead
Topical Reporting --
Homicide Report

Coming up:

The Olympics blog is about to go full steam ahead with the opening ceremonies this Friday. Folks are also preparing for the conventions later this month.

Most-viewed articles for July:
Jackson's Obama comments almost went unnoticed (Matea Gold)
5.4 quake rocks L.A. area (Joel Rubin, David Pierson and Mitchell Landsberg)
IndyMac Bank seized by federal regulators (Kathy M. Kristof and Andrea Chang)
McCain's broken marriage and fractured Reagan friendship (Richard A. Serrano and Ralph Vartabedian)
For Republicans, the Senate outlook is bad (Janet Hook)
Concerned about gang signs, NFL reviews tapes (Sam Farmer)
Banks hit by fallout from the crisis at IndyMac (E. Scott Reckard and Andrea Chang)
Interrogation, then revenge (Joel Rubin and Ari B. Bloomekatz)
Los Angeles condo sells for $2,848 (per square foot) (Roger Vincent)
In study, evidence of liberal-bias bias (James Rainey)


Top 20 blogs for July follow.

Blog traffic broke an all-time record this month of more than 12 million page views. Tony Pierce notes that July 2007 blog page views were 2.2 million page views. Incredible growth.
Top of the Ticket -- 1,800,770 PVs
The Dish Rag -- 1,666,702
L.A. Land -- 1,205,609
Gold Derby -- 655,369
Show Tracker -- 516,324
Lakers
Countdown to Crawford (more than 500K in its first full month)
Hero Complex (launched July 16)
Technology
Web Scout
The Big Picture
Booster Shots
The Daily Travel & Deal Blog
Opinion L.A.
The Homicide Report
L.A. Now
Ticket to Beijing (Olympics)
Money & Co
Entertainment News & Buzz
L.A. Unleashed
Your Scene, our user-generated photo service, generated 6.6 million page views in July. Bravo to Lindsay Barnett, Your Scene producer extraordinaire.


Top photo galleries:
Dancing badly with the stars (Elizabeth Snead)
10 magazine covers that shook the world
A brief history of the Joker (Patrick Day)
Deaths that shocked us
Celebrity shots
Las Vegas party pools (The Guide)
Gap fire
5.4 quake rocks Los Angeles area
Foreclosed and for sale: Bank-owned listings from Glendale to Redondo Beach
A marriage in pictures: Madonna and Guy (Elizabeth Snead)
Top video:
King-Harbor Hospital lobby death - 21,056 streams - LAT
Security camera captures California earthquake -­ 19,774 streams - ­LAT ­(footage courtesy of Incycle in San Dimas, CA )
Time-lapse journey through Comic-Con - 16,332 streams -­ LAT
Jackson apologizes for remark - 15,603 streams - AP
Woman murdered in Century City - 12,410 streams - LAT
Kenneth Turan reviews ‘The Dark Knight’ - 11,871 streams - LAT
Inside Qantas flight - 2731433 - 11,107 streams - AP

Governor:

Californians need to prepare for anything - 10,476 streams - KTLA
Customers grow furious outside Encino IndyMac branch - 10,091 streams - KTLA


Quake recap:

LAX flooding, viewer experience, CalTech maps - 9,408 streams - KTLA

That’s it.
Questions, concerns, ideas for an even brighter future? Send ’em along.

Meredith Artley
Executive Editor, LATimes.com


http://latimesblogs.latimes.com:80/readers/2008/08/colleagues-we-c.html





www.aplaceintheauvergne.blogspot.com


International Herald Tribune
IHT
New York Times
NYT